Showing posts with label AlQahira AlYoum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AlQahira AlYoum. Show all posts

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Don't Go Dutch

Amr Adib, the presenter of AlQahira Alyoum, & the Islamic intellectual Salim al-Awa are leading a campaign calling for a two-week boycott of all Dutch products (10th - 25th April) as a protest at MP Geert Wilders' anti-Qur'an film, Fitna.

The limited period boycott, that is expected to make a small dent in the Dutch economy, is meant to achieve a couple of goals:
  • Urge the Dutch government to ban the movie
  • Urge the Dutch government to pass a legislation criminalizing the desecration of all religions including Islam (in place of or alongside the current law which only criminalizes - the ambiguous and stretchable - antisemitism)
  • Take the Dutch industrials and business owners up on their word to sue Wilders for damages in case their sales are negatively affected by the publication of the movie
  • Discourage other wackos from doing a similar acts
  • Give zealous Muslims (especially young men who usually take matters in their own hands with grave results) a legitimate and civilized way to express their outrage without resorting to violence (I added this gaol since I thought it was important)
Some Muslims disagree with this call saying that campaigns against small countries such as Denmark and the Netherlands are hypocritical, as the worst abuses comes from the United States government which has allowed (and might have ordered) the desecration of the Qur'an in Guantánamo. Moreover, the US is occupying an Arab country, but nobody dares to call for sanctions against the US.

Others say, that the true insults against Islam and the prophet are committed by the Muslims themselves, who have limited their religious obligation to the mechanical acts of worship . without understanding the values they promote. “And we did not send you except as a Mercy for all Creation.” If we truly love Mohammad, then I ask his followers, where is the evidence of the mercy mentioned in the holy verse in Muslim individuals, families, streets, schools, hospitals, factories, governments, ......... ??????

Although I was a supporter of the call to ignore all similar attacks on Islam since Islam is too great a religion to be defeated by such petty attempts, but for the sake of unity, I am now in support of the boycott.

Come on, you did not really think I would end this post without putting in my two sense. Since I am a believer in leading by example, I suggest that the Egyptian legislators would take the initiative and pass a law to criminalize any desecration of any religion. I know, some would say that we don't need such a law in Egypt since Muslims believe in all religions and are required to respect all prophets, so a counter reply is out of the questions. To those wise guys I say:
  • The option of desecrating "their" religion as a response to the desecration of "ours" and as I mentioned earlier, is out of the questions for religious reasons, so we are not giving up a viable option that we could have otherwise used as a negotiation card.
  • If you are so sure that no Muslim will ever attack Christianity or Judaism, then you should still embrace this law since it protects Islam against any attacks by a crazed Muslim, a Christian, a Jew, a follower of any other religion, or a non-believer.
  • You cannot deny the presence of some ignorant so called imams who may end a sermon by showering Christians and Jews with hostile prayers (to say the least). Offensive language could also be found on TV, or in printed media. This crime must stop. Any yes I do call it a crime because it is totally against the tolerance of Islam and because it threatens the unity of the Egyptian fabric which is weaved from Muslims & Copts.
  • Such law will force all Egyptians to start being "politically correct". For example, some imams might be furious about the crimes committed against the Palestinians. yet, they should learn to call the criminals Zionists and not Jews. This should also spread to the movies, TV series, newspapers, and so on.
  • This "political correctness" must also be observed with regard to color, race, physical disabilities, hight, weight, marital status, nationality, political beliefs, ........... you name it.
  • Once we have such a law at home, we would have more leverage and credibility in asking for a similar UN resolution to be passed by the security council.
Wow, this was meant to be a short post. I have no idea what happened!!!

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

AlQahira's Pigs

During my lunchtime, I am usually able to follow part of the popular TV program AlQahira AlYoum presented by Amr Adeeb. In the past couple of years, and specially with the departure of annoying Nirvana, Amr has gained a lot of popularity and fame. Although most daily "journalism - entertainment shows" (Al 3ashera Masa2an, 90 Minutes, El Bait Baitak) more or less discuss the same topics, Amr is still able to attract more viewers because of his long experience, genuine interest in the topics he discusses, and excellent sense of humor.

The only thing that annoyed me, was his views when it came to women which he usually expressed on his weekly segment with Ragaa Gidawi. But I always interpreted those views as a way to make the program more entertaining (by pretending that he is a chauvinist pig), and accordingly did not take them seriously.

After watching part of last night's show, I actually decided to stop my subscription with Orbit. Amr has fell to new low (which I cannot overlook or excuse even though he is a loyal Zamalkawee). The views he expressed regarding women were extremely offensive and totally unacceptable. When a TV personality, who is expected to help develop the society, has, and is not ashamed to publicly express, such backward & regressive views, then responsible viewers have an obligation to boycott his program.

The guest Amr most agreed and identified with (needless to say he was totally against every word uttered by his other guest Ikbal Baraka) was another chauvinist pig who started a group called "Sisayed"(after Nagiub Mahfouz's lead character in his trilogy). This idiot who promotes the need to go back to the family setup of the thirties when women were not allowed to leave the house and were treated as a property owned by their husbands has totally missed Mahfouz's opinion of Ahmed Abdul Gawad (aka Sisayed).

To Amr and his friend I need to explain (even though I doubt they have the capacity or will to understand) that Mahfouz has portrayed Adbul Gawad as a hypocrite who is extremely stern with his wife and kids, not allowing his wife to leave the house even to visit a mosque or her married daughters, while he lead a life of a brazen adulterer who spends his nights in brothels drunk in the arms of prostitutes. To have him as your idol speaks loads of your messed up moral believes. If this character is the idol of Amr Adeeb and his guest, then I gladly tell them that they have my disdain & disrespect.

And I would love to see how Amr will defend his views to his wive. My guess is: he is in big trouble. Unless of course he is married to Miss Piggy.